Written By
Updated on
If you're a UK homeowner, landlord, or owner of a commercial property considering investing in renewable energy, understanding the differences between ground-mounted and roof-mounted solar systems is crucial.
These solar photovoltaic (PV) setups can help reduce your energy bills, lower your carbon footprint, and even allow you to sell excess electricity back to the grid through schemes like the Smart Export Guarantee.
With solar PV deployment in the UK reaching 18.9 GW as of May 2025, mostly from ground-mounted installations in larger scales but with over 1.3 million rooftop systems on homes, there's never been a better time to explore your options.
This guide breaks down the key aspects to help you decide which solar installation type suits your needs.
When deciding between ground-mounted and roof-mounted solar systems, it's helpful to start with the basics.
To give you a snapshot, here's a comparison table highlighting key factors like energy efficiency, performance, and more. This will help you quickly weigh up the options before diving deeper.
Aspect | Ground-Mounted Solar Systems | Roof-Mounted Solar Systems |
---|---|---|
Energy Efficiency | Often higher (up to 15-25% more output if optimally angled and cooled) due to better airflow and adjustable orientation. | Good, but can be 5-10% lower due to roof-fixed angles and higher heat buildup. |
Performance | Excellent in open areas; can track the sun for maximum exposure. Average UK capacity factor: 9.8-11.4%. | Reliable but dependent on roof direction (south-facing ideal); same capacity factor range. |
Installation Costs | Higher: £7,000-£10,000 for a 3.5 kWp system, including mounting frames. | Lower: Around £6,100 for a 3.5 kWp system. |
Installation Requirements | Needs ample garden space (at least 20-30 m² for a standard system), flat land, and often planning permission. | Requires a sturdy, south-facing roof with no shading; no extra land needed. |
Lifespan | 25-30 years, similar to roof-mounted. | 25-30 years, but may need roof repairs over time. |
Best Suited Properties | Rural homes, large gardens, commercial sites, or properties with unsuitable roofs (e.g., listed buildings). | Urban homes, apartments, or properties with limited ground space. |
Maintenance and Cleaning | Easier access at ground level; may need more frequent cleaning due to debris. | Harder to reach; rain often cleans if tilted >15°. |
Servicing | Simpler and cheaper due to accessibility; inverters checked annually. | May require scaffolding for servicing, increasing costs. |
Aesthetics | More visible, can impact garden views; modern designs blend better. | Less obtrusive, integrates with roofline. |
Environmental Impact | Higher land use but can support biodiversity if designed with pollinator-friendly plants. | Minimal land impact; reduces urban heat islands. |
Scalability | Easier to expand with available space. | Limited by roof size. |
Planning and Permits | Often requires local council approval in the UK. | Usually permitted development if under certain sizes. |
If you're ready to explore options, consider using Eco Answers' free Quote-Comparison Tool. Our easy-to-use tool connects you with trusted suppliers offering competitive quotes tailored to your needs.
Just provide a few details, and we’ll match you with reputable providers to get started on your solar journey.
Ground-mounted solar panel systems consist of PV panels fixed on frames or racks anchored to the ground, typically in a garden or open field.
They work by converting sunlight into direct current (DC) electricity via photovoltaic cells, which an inverter then transforms into alternating current (AC) for home or business use. In the UK, these systems are popular for larger-scale setups, contributing to the nation's 18.9 GW solar capacity.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Can be positioned for maximum efficiency regardless of roof pitch | Requires available land space |
Easier to clean and maintain | More expensive to install due to structural supports |
Allows for larger systems due to more space | May require planning permission in the UK |
Better airflow can improve panel performance in hot weather | More visible and can affect garden or landscaping aesthetics |
Less shading risk in open locations |
Roof-mounted solar panel systems attach panels directly to your roof using brackets or integrated tiles, capturing sunlight to produce electricity through the same PV process as ground systems.
They're the most common in the UK, with over 1.3 million installations helping households save around £750 annually in some cases.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Lower installation costs compared to ground-mounted systems | Efficiency limited by roof orientation and pitch |
No additional land required | Harder to access for cleaning or servicing |
Discreet and less visible from ground level | May require roof reinforcement before installation |
Ideal for urban properties with limited space | Shading from chimneys, trees, or other buildings can reduce output |
Often quicker installation times |
While both ground and roof-mounted solar systems offer sustainable energy solutions, their differences lie in factors like site suitability, financial implications, and operational ease.
According to Ofgem, choosing the right type can maximise your return on investment through reduced bills and export payments. Below, we discuss these key differences in depth, drawing on UK-specific data to help you compare.
Solar panel efficiency refers to how effectively the panels convert sunlight into usable electricity. Ground-mounted systems often edge out due to customisable angles and better ventilation, which can improve output by 10-15% in the UK's variable climate.
For instance, Solar Energy UK notes that optimal tilting can capture more of the 750-1,100 kWh/m² annual insolation in southern England.
Roof-mounted systems, however, are constrained by your roof's pitch and direction, ideally 30-40° south-facing for peak performance. But, shading from chimneys or trees can reduce this by up to 20%. In practice, both achieve capacity factors of 9.8-11.4%, but ground setups shine in open areas.
Efficiency Factor | Ground-Mounted | Roof-Mounted |
---|---|---|
Optimal Angle Adjustment | Yes, fully adjustable | Limited to roof pitch |
Cooling Effect | High (better airflow) | Moderate (roof heat buildup) |
Shading Risk | Low if sited well | Higher from structures |
Average Output Boost | Up to 25% higher | Baseline |
Winner: Ground-mounted, for its flexibility in maximising solar capture.
Get a QuotePerformance encompasses not only overall electricity generation but also the consistency and reliability of output over time.
Ground-mounted solar arrays typically outperform roof-mounted installations in rural UK settings with unobstructed sunlight.
Their adjustable tilt allows for optimal seasonal alignment, and some systems incorporate single- or dual-axis tracking technology to follow the sun’s movement, increasing energy yields by 10–20% annually compared to fixed-position panels.
These benefits are particularly noticeable in the winter months when the sun is lower in the sky, as the angle can be adjusted to capture more light.
Roof-mounted systems, on the other hand, are more constrained by the existing roof pitch and orientation. In the UK, south-facing roofs offer the best performance, but east- or west-facing roofs can produce up to 15% less electricity annually.
Despite this, they still provide consistent and predictable output for urban and suburban homes, especially when paired with microinverters or power optimisers to mitigate the impact of shading from chimneys, trees, or neighbouring buildings.
According to the , a typical 3.5 kWp system in the UK can generate between 3,000 and 4,000 kWh per year depending on location, higher in sunnier areas such as Somerset, lower in cloudier regions like the Scottish Highlands.
While the UK is known for its mixed weather, solar PV panels don’t need constant sunshine, they generate electricity from daylight, not just direct sunlight. However, certain weather patterns can influence performance:
Ground-mounted systems have an advantage here. The greater airflow around panels helps dissipate heat, maintaining higher efficiency than roof-mounted panels, which can be affected by heat build-up from the roof surface.
In practical terms, weather variability affects both systems, but ground-mounted arrays often retain a slight edge in annual performance due to better positioning, airflow cooling, and reduced shading risk.
Winner: Ground-Mounted Solar Systems for their potential to achieve maximum efficiency across all UK seasons.
Installation costs vary significantly. Roof-mounted systems average £6,100 for 3.5 kWp, including panels, inverter, and labour, as per the Energy Saving Trust.
Ground-mounted setups cost more, roughly around £7,000 - £12,000 due to foundations, frames, and longer cabling. Factors like system size (e.g., 4-6 kWp for larger homes) and location influence prices, with grants like ECO4 scheme potentially offsetting costs for eligible households.
System Size | Ground-Mounted Cost | Roof-Mounted Cost |
---|---|---|
3.5 kWp | £7,000-£10,000 | £6,100 |
5.0 kWp | £9,000-£14,000 | £8,000-£10,000 |
10.0 kWp (Commercial) | £18,000-£25,000 | £15,000-£20,000 |
Winner: Roof-mounted, for lower initial outlay.
Get a QuoteGround-mounted systems demand flat, unshaded land and often planning permission from your local council, especially if over 9 m².
Roof-mounted require a structural survey to ensure the roof can bear 15-20 kg/m² weight, plus MCS-certified installers for compliance.
Winner: Roof-mounted, simpler for most properties.
Both solar panel systems last 25-30 years, with warranties covering 80% efficiency at year 25. Ground systems may endure better without roof wear, but regular checks are key.
Winner: Tie, as durability is comparable.
When deciding between ground-mounted and roof-mounted solar systems, the type of property plays a significant role in determining which option will deliver the best long-term results.
Ground-mounted solar systems are ideal for:
Roof-mounted solar systems are better suited to:
Winner: There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Ground-mounted systems excel for land-rich properties where maximum generation potential is a priority, while roof-mounted systems are the go-to choice for space-limited urban or suburban settings.
Keeping solar panels in good condition is essential for maintaining performance over their 25–30 year lifespan. Maintenance typically involves:
Ground-mounted solar systems offer a clear advantage in maintenance accessibility. Panels are easy to reach without ladders or scaffolding, allowing for:
Roof-mounted solar systems benefit from their elevated position, which keeps them cleaner naturally thanks to rainfall washing away most debris. This makes them relatively low maintenance in terms of cleaning frequency. However:
The Energy Saving Trust notes that significant dirt accumulation can reduce solar output by up to 5–10%, so periodic cleaning is a cost-effective performance boost.
Maintenance Factor | Ground-Mounted | Roof-Mounted |
---|---|---|
Ease of access | Easy — no ladders or scaffolding | Harder — requires roof access |
Cleaning frequency | May require more frequent cleaning | Less frequent due to rainfall |
Servicing costs | £80–£120 per annual service | £150–£250 per annual service (due to scaffolding or safety equipment) |
Safety risk | Low | Higher (working at height) |
Common issues | Dust, vegetation growth | Pigeon nesting, difficult access |
Winner: Ground-mounted, for accessibility.
Get a QuoteThe visual impact of a solar installation can influence not only the property’s appearance but also its resale value and appeal to potential buyers or tenants.
Roof-mounted solar systems generally blend more seamlessly with the architecture of a building, especially when using all-black monocrystalline panels that match modern roof aesthetics.
Integrated or “in-roof” designs can make them even less obtrusive by sitting flush with the roof tiles. From street level, they are often only partially visible, which makes them more acceptable in urban and suburban neighbourhoods where visual impact is a concern.
Ground-mounted solar systems, on the other hand, are far more visible and can be perceived as intrusive if placed prominently in gardens or open fields. However, visual impact can be minimised by:
According to a on the impact of energy efficiency on house prices, properties with higher EPC (Energy Performance Certificate) ratings typically command higher sale prices.
Solar PV installations can directly improve a property’s EPC rating by reducing reliance on grid electricity.
Winner: Roof-Mounted Solar Systems for their ability to integrate with existing architecture, maintain kerb appeal, and still deliver a measurable boost to property value without dominating the landscape.
Choosing between a ground-mounted or roof-mounted solar system isn’t a one-size-fits-all decision. It depends on factors like space, budget, roof structure, and your goals for efficiency and aesthetics.
Who is it for:
Who it is not for:
Choose it if:
Who is it for:
Who it is not for:
Choose it if:
Yes, but it requires specialised mounting frames to level the array, potentially adding £500-£1,000 to costs. Consult an MCS-certified installer for a site assessment to ensure stability and compliance with British Standards.
In areas like Scotland, ground-mounted systems can handle snow better with adjustable tilts to shed buildup, while roof-mounted may accumulate more if steeply pitched. Both perform in low light, but expect 10-15% lower yields than southern England.
Ground-mounted arrays may require additional coverage for theft or vandalism, costing £50-£100 extra annually. Standard home insurance often covers roof-mounted, but always check with providers like Aviva or AXA for solar-specific policies.
Pairing with storage like a 5 kWh battery (£3,000-£5,000) allows storing excess energy for evening use, increasing self-consumption from 50% to 80%. This works equally well for both types, boosting savings under variable UK tariffs.
The SEG pays for exported electricity regardless of mount type, with rates up to 15p/kWh from suppliers like Octopus Energy. Larger ground systems might export more, maximising earnings, but eligibility requires MCS certification for both.
In weighing ground versus roof-mounted solar systems, we've covered their operational mechanics, advantages, drawbacks, and critical differences to empower your choice.
With UK solar adoption surging, selecting the right setup can deliver substantial energy independence and environmental benefits tailored to your home or business. Take the next step by comparing quotes through Eco Answers to turn insights into action.